What can LawVM establish from your sources?

Describe the source regime and legal-information job. The browser produces a bounded first-pass capability map, blocked-source list, and pilot brief. Processing stays in this browser.

Choose by starting artifact: paper, scans, or incomplete archives begin with source bootstrap; a structured export begins with pre-publication QA; a published text plus amendment sources begins with consolidation assurance. The assessment routes evidence from declared sources and a model to declared checks, a strict or observe-only disposition, and a named human decision.

1. Which jurisdiction or source regime? Jurisdiction, territory, or source system Institution and requesting role (optional for the first pass) Source or IT contact role Decision owner role Data boundary

2. What is the primary objective?

Audit a published consolidation Reconstruct point-in-time text Review official-language expressions Add drafting or publication checks Recover structured state from legacy sources Build a jurisdiction frontend

3. What is the authority status of the text you would compare against?

Authoritative official text Official editorial or derived text Private/editorial publication Unknown or varies

4. What is the strongest source format?

Versioned API or structured feed XML / Akoma Ntoso / structured JSON Structured or semi-structured HTML Searchable PDFs Scanned gazettes or page images Mixed or uncertain

For scans, OCR is one observation lane. Character, reading-order, grouping, table, completeness, legal-structure, and amendment claims each require their own evidence.

5. Which source evidence is available?

Original enactments Amendment publications Historical consolidated versions Machine-readable effective dates Amendments linked to affected laws/provisions Stable work/version identifiers

6. Language and review context

One authoritative language Several authoritative languages One authoritative language plus translations Language authority is unclear Local source/legal reviewer is available Pilot may involve non-public material

This deterministic browser-side routing aid proposes a first-pass pilot shape. Your answers remain in the browser; choosing the email action opens your client with the generated brief. Legal and technical feasibility require separate review.

JavaScript is disabled: the assessment uses JavaScript to calculate its result locally. To request a manual first pass, open your email client and send your jurisdiction, institution and requesting role, source or IT contact role, decision owner role, objective, source formats, available evidence, data boundary, language context, reviewer availability, and any confidentiality constraints to hello@lawvm.org. Agree a processing boundary before arranging confidential or restricted source transfer.

What can LawVM establish from your sources?

Recommended starting point

Immediate capability

Potential with more evidence

Currently blocked or qualified